Pages

Sunday, 29 January 2017

DR EDWARD BACH: HEALING BY HERBS FOR USE IN EVERY HOME

2017 0129 05  Dr Edward Bach: Healing by Herbs for use in Every Home

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Public Lecture
IN   THE
MASONIC     HALL, WALLINGFORD,
ON
Thursday, Sept. 2·4th
AT   8    P.M.,
Healing by Herbs
For  use  in every  Home,
BY
Dr.  EDWA RD  BACH

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From the earliest times in history, we find that herbs have been used as healing remedies, and as far back as records go, man has had the faith that in the herbs of the meadow and valley and hillside lay the power to cure his illnesses. Hundreds of years before Christ, the ancient Indians and Arabians and other races were experts in the use of Nature's gifts; also the early Egyptians, and later the Greeks and Romans, and in a lesser degree right on up till our time.

Now, it is not likely that for thousands of years, great nations of different creeds and colours should have continuously believed in, and persistently studied and used the Herbs of Nature as cures,  unless behind it all there was a great truth. In olden days, not only the physicians of the countries used and taught the use of herbs, but the people themselves had great knowledge of their virtue, and were able to care for themselves in many cases of disorders.

During history there have been times, when disease was successfully dealt with by practically herbs alone; at other times the great and natural art of healing has largely been forgotten: this is one of those times. But such is the power of Nature's way, that it is certain to return to us. The herbs spoken of in this lecture, although but recently discovered, are already being used widely in very many parts of the world.

It is certain that at those times when the right herbs were known and used, wonderful healing results must have been general, and the people of those ages must have had very great faith in them: unless this were so, the fame, the faith, the belief of cure placed in herbs, would not have survived the rise and fall of empires, and been continuously in the minds of people for hundreds and thousands of years.

Healing with the clean, pure, beautiful agents of Nature is surely the one method of all which appeals to most of us, and deep down in our inner self, surely there is something about it that rings true indeed: something which tells us - this is Nature's way and is right.

To Nature we look confidently for all the needs to keep us alive - air, light, food, drink, and so on: it is not likely that in this great scheme which provides all, the healing of our illnesses and distress should be forgotten.

So we see that Herbal treatment goes back to the very earliest times known to man; that it has continued all these centuries both in use and in fame, and at many times in history has been the chief and almost the only method of healing.

The system being spoken of this evening has great advantages over others.

Dr Edward Bach [1886-1936]
Firstly. All the remedies are made from beautiful flowers, plants and trees of Nature: none of them are poisonous nor can do any harm, no matter how much was taken.

Secondly. They are only 38 in number, which means that it is easier to find the right herb to give, than when there are very many.

Thirdly. The method of choosing which remedies to give is simple enough for most people to understand.

Fourthly. The cures which have been obtained have been so wonderful, that they have passed all expectations of even those who use this method, as well as the patients who have received the benefit.

These herbs have succeeded again and again where all other treatment, which has been tried, has failed. And now, having given you some idea of how ancient and renowned is the great art of healing the suffering by means of herbs, let us pass on to the main reason of this evening's address.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The main objects of this evening's lecture are two: Firstly: to describe to you a new method of herbal healing. Secondly:to reduce as much as possible any fear that any of you may have of disease.

Although it is but some seven years ago since the first of a series of the 38 herbs, which are the subject of this address, was discovered, yet in that short time these herbs have been proved to have the most wonderful power of healing. This proof has been found not only in this country, not only in countries on the Continent, but in lands as far distant as India, America, New Zealand, Australia and so on.

It is impossible to tell you of the very great number of people who have had benefit and cures, because they are scattered almost world-wide: but this we know, that hundreds and thousands of sufferers have received help which they had not thought was possible, and beyond any hope which had been left in them.

The important points of treatment with these herbs are: 

1] that the remedies are all made from beautiful plants and trees of Nature, and that none of them are hurtful nor can they do any harm.

2] that  without a knowledge of medicine their use can be understood so easily that they can be used in the household. 

Think a moment what this means. There are amongst us in almost every town or village some who have to a lesser or greater degree the desire to be able to help in illness; to be able to relieve the suffering and heal the sick, but from circumstances have been prevented from becoming doctors or nurses, and have not felt that they were able to carry out their desire or mission.

These herbs place in their hands the power to heal amongst their own families, friends and all around them. In addition to their occupation, they are enabled in their spare time to do a very great amount of good, as many are so doing today; and there are some who have even given up their work to devote all their time to this form of healing.

It means to those who always had an ideal, a dream of relieving the suffering, that it has been made possible for them, whether it be but their own household or on a wider scale.

Again to impress upon you that there is no need of scientific knowledge necessary when treating with these herbs: not even the name of the illness or disease is required. It is not the disease that matters: it is the patient. It is not what the patient has. It is not the disease, so-called, that really is the important thing to treat; because the same disease may cause different results in different people. 

If the effects were always the same in all people, it would be easy to know what the name of the disease was: but this is not so; and this is the reason why often in medical science it is so difficult to give a name to the particular complaint from which a patient is suffering.

It is not the disease that is of importance. It is the patient; the way in which he or she is affected which is our true guide to healing. In ordinary every day life, everyone of us has a character of our own. This is made up of our likes, our dislikes, our ideas, thoughts, wishes, ambitions, the way we treat others, and so on.

Now this character is not of the body, it is of the mind; and the mind is the most delicate and sensitive part of ourselves. So can we wonder that the mind with its various moods will be the first to show the symptoms of disease; and being so sensitive, will be a much better guide to us in illness than depending on the body. Changes in our minds will guide us clearly to the remedy we need; when the body may show little alteration.

Now let us turn our attention to some of the different ways in which one particular complaint can affect an individual. We all know the same illness may take us quite differently: if Tommy gets measles, he may be irritable - Sissy may be quiet and drowsy - Johnny wants to be petted - little Peter may be all nerves and fearful - Bobbie wants to be left alone, and so on.

Now, if the disease has such different effects, it is certain it is no use treating the disease alone; it is better to treat Tommy, Sissy, and Johnny and Peter and Bobbie and get them each well, and 'goodbye' the measles.

What it is important to impress upon you, is that it is not the measles which gives the guide to the cure, but it is the way the little one is affected: and the mood of the little one is the most sensitive guide as to know what that particular patient needs.

And just as moods guide us to the treatment in illness, so also they may warn us ahead of a complaint approaching and enable us to stop the attack.

Little  Tommy  comes  home  from  school  unusually  tired,  or drowsy, or irritable, or wanting to be fussed, or perhaps left alone and so on. He is 'not quite himself' as we say. Kind neighbours come in and say, 'Tommy is sickening for something, you will have to wait'. But why wait: if Tommy is treated then according to his mood, he may very soon again be turned from ‘not quite  himself' into 'quite himself', when whatever illness was threatened will not occur.

And so with any of us: before almost all complaints there is usually a time of not being quite fit or a bit run down: that is the time to treat our condition, get fit and stop things going further. Prevention is better than cure, and these remedies help us in a wonderful way to get well, and to protect ourselves from attack of things unpleasant.

So much for the earliest stages of disease. Now let us think about those who have been ill for some time, or even a long time. There is again every reason to be hopeful of benefit, either improvement or recovery. Never let anyone give up hope of getting well: such wonderful improvements and such marvellous recoveries have happened with the use of these herbs, even in those in which it was considered hopeless that anything could be done; that to despair is no longer necessary.

Chronic invalids have been restored to a life of usefulness, attended with a return of much happiness and a better and brighter outlook on life in general. Do not let anyone be frightened at the name given to any disease; after all, what is in a name: and there is no disease of itself which is incurable. This can be asserted, because those suffering from those types of complaints whose names are most dreaded and feared have become well. If some patients have done this, so can others. It takes less time occasionally to cure a so-called terrible illness in some, than one considered less severe in others. It depends more on the individual than the illness.

Now, it is just the same principle of treatment in long illness as when it is slight and short or only even threatened. Because in a complaint which has been going on for some time we still have our characters; our wishes, hopes, ideas, likes, dislikes and so on.

So again all that is required is to take notice how a patient is being affected by the illness; if there is depression, hopelessness of getting well, fear of becoming worse, irritability, wanting companionship, desire to be quiet and alone, and so on; and to choose the remedy or remedies suitable for the different moods.

And it is wonderful here again, that just as in threatened illness, if we can get a patient back from being 'not quite themselves', the disease will not happen; so in cases which have been going on for a long time, as the various moods, depression, fear etc., disappear, so the patients are better in themselves, more like their real selves, and with this the disease, no matter what it may be, goes also.

There is yet another class of people, quite different: those who are not really ill in the ordinary sense of the word; yet are always having something wrong with them; perhaps not serious, yet quite enough to make life a trial and a burden at times, and who would be grateful indeed to be rid of their complaints. Mostly they have tried many things to be free of their trouble, but have not been able to find a cure. Amongst such are those who have frequent headaches; others are subject to severe colds each year; some suffer from catarrh, or rheumatics, or indigestion, or eye-strain, or asthma, or slight heart- trouble, sleeplessness, and so on, whatever it may be.

And what a joy it is to be able to give such people relief. when often they had expected they would have to bear their infirmity all their life; and especially to those who had dreaded that their symptoms might get worse with age. Such cases can be cured and very often benefit begins soon after treatment has started.

And lastly, one more class: people who are quite well, strong and healthy, and yet have their difficulties. Such people who find their work or play made more difficult from things like: over-anxiety to do right, or too enthusiastic, and strain and tire themselves: or those who fear failure, imagining themselves not as clever as other people: or those unable to make up their minds as to what they want: those who are afraid something will happen to those dear to them, who always fear the worst, even without any reason: those who are too active and restless and never seem at peace: those who are too sensitive and shy and nervous, and so on. All such things, though they may not be called illnesses, cause unhappiness and worry: yet all these can be put right and an added joy comes into life.

So we see how great is the power of the right herbs to heal; not only to keep us strong and protect us from disease, not only to stop an illness when it is threatened, not only to relieve and cure us when we may be in distress and ill, but even to bring peace and happiness and joy to our minds when there is apparently nothing wrong with our health. 

Once again, let it be made quite certain that, whether it is being run down, or not quite oneself; Whether trying to prevent a disease; whether it is a short illness or a long, the principle is the same - treat the patient; treat the patient according to the mood, according to the character, the individuality, and you can not go wrong.

Think once again the joy this brings, to any one who wants to be able to do something for those who are ill, to be able to help even those where medical science can do no more; it gives to them the power to be healers amongst their fellows. Yet again, think what a different outlook this brings into our lives; the loss of fear, and the increase of hope.





Sunday, 22 January 2017

HOMEOPATHY CURES THE SICK: DR KENT'S COMMENTARY

2017 0122 04  Homeopathy Cures the Sick: Dr Kent's Commentary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dr Samuel Hahnemann [1755-1843]

Homeopathy cures [quickly, gently and permanently] the sick [individual] with a single simple remedy [at one time] in infinitesimal dose, which is potentized, proven [on the healthy], and based on the natural law of similars [similia similibus], by perceiving [through the senses] the guiding symptoms [mental and physical].  
Homeopathy is a perfectly simple system of medicine, remaining always fixed in its principles as in its practice. 

--  compiled from Hahnemann's Organon



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is an excerpt from Dr James Tyler Kent's "Lectures on Homeopathic Philosophy" which is essentially a commentary on Hahnemann's ORGANON:


Organon § 1. "The physician's high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, to cure as it is termed."

The true homoeopath, when he speaks of the sick, knows who it is that is sick, whereas the allopath does not know. The latter thinks that the tissue changes [which are only the results of disease], are all that there is of the sick man.

Now what is meant by "the sick?" It is a man that is sick and to be restored to health, not his body, not the tissues. You will find many people who will say, "I am sick." They will enumerate pages of symptoms, pages of suffering. They look sick.

But they tell you : "I have been to the most eminent physicians. I have had my chest examined. I have been to the neurologist. I have been to the cardiac specialist and have had my heart examined. The eye specialist has examined my eyes. I have been to the gynecologist and have had my uterus examined", says the woman. I have been physically examined from head to foot, and they tell me I am not sick, I have no disease."

But at present the patient is not sick, says the learned doctor, "But what do all these symptoms mean? I do not sleep at night, I have pains and aches. My bowels do not move." "Oh, well, you have constipation." That is the first thing that has been diagnosed. But do all these things exist without a cause?

It would seem from one opinion that the "constipation" is the disease per se, but from another opinion it would appear to be the cause of disease; the "diagnosis" is made to apply to one as much as to the other. 

These symptoms are but the language of nature, talking out as it were, and showing as clearly as the daylight the internal nature of the sick man or woman. If this state progresses the lungs break down.

The doctor says, "Oh, now you have consumption;" or a great change appears in the liver, and he says, "Oh, now you have fatty degeneration of the liver;" or albumen appears in the urine, and he tells the patient..". Now I am able to name your disease. You have some one of the forms of Bright's disease."

Under traditional methods it is necessary that a diagnosis be made before the treatment can be settled, but in most cases the diagnosis cannot be made until the results of disease have rendered the patient incurable.

For an eruption on the skin we would use local means to stimulate the functions of the skin and make it heal, and believing the eruption had no cause behind it we would conscientiously think we had cured the patient.

But this is the reductio ad absurdum, for nothing exists without a cause. The organs are not the man. The man is prior to the organs. From first to last is the order of sickness as well as the order of cure. From man to his organs and not from organs to the man.

The combination of the will and the understanding, constitute man; conjoined they make life and activity they manufacture the body and cause all things of the body. With the will and understanding operating in order we have a healthy man.

The will is expressed in the face ; its result is implanted on the countenance. The countenance then is expressive of the heart. Allopathic pathology recognizes nothing but man's body. The homoeopath must master these things before he can perceive the nature of the cause of disease and before he can understand what cure is.

It is the sole duty of the physician to heal the sick. It is not his sole duty to heal the results of sickness, but the sickness, itself, when the man himself has been restored to health, there will be restored harmony in the tissues and in the activities. Then the sole duty of the physician is to put in order the interior of the economy i.e., the will and understanding conjoined.

Tissue changes are of the body and are the results of disease. They are not the disease. Hahnemann once said, "There are no diseases, but sick people," from which it is clear that Hahnemann understood that the diseases so called, e.g., Bright's disease, liver disease, etc. were but the grosser forms of disease results, viz., appearances of disease.

There is first disorder of government, and this proceeds from within outward until we have pathological changes in the tissues. In the practice of medicine today, the idea of government is not found, and the tissue changes only are taken into account. He who considers disease results to be the disease itself, and expects to do away with these as disease, is insane.

The bacteria are results of disease. In the course of time we will be able to show perfectly that the microscopical little fellows are not the disease cause, but that they come after, that they are scavengers accompanying the disease, and that they are perfectly harmless in every respect.

They are the outcome of the disease, are present wherever the disease is, and by the microscope it has been discovered that every pathological result has its corresponding bacteria. The Old School consider these the cause, but we will be able to show that disease cause is much more subtle than anything that can be shown by a microscope.

In a note under para one, Hahnemann says: "The physician's mission is not, however, to construct so called systems, by interweaving empty speculations and hypotheses concerning the internal essential nature of the vital processes and the mode in which diseases originate in the invisible interior of the organism," etc.

We know that in the present day people are perfectly satisfied if they can find the name of the disease they are supposed to have, an idea cloaked in some wonderful technicality. Prescribing for the results of disease causes changes in the results of disease, but not in the sickness except to hurry its progress.